I'm seeing underruns with these 64bpp YUV formats on TGL.
The weird details:
- only happens on pipe B/C/D SDR planes, pipe A SDR planes
seem fine, as do all HDR planes
- somehow CDCLK related, higher CDCLK allows for bigger plane
with these formats without underruns. With 300MHz CDCLK I
can only go up to 1200 pixels wide or so, with 650MHz even
a 3840 pixel wide plane was OK
- ICL and ADL so far appear unaffected
So not really sure what's the deal with this, but bspec does
state "64-bit formats supported only on the HDR planes" so
let's just drop these formats from the SDR planes. We already
disallow 64bpp RGB formats.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241218173650.19782-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 35e1aacfe5)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Xe3 is capable of switching automatically to min ddb allocation
(not using any extra blocks) or interim SAGV-adjusted allocation
in case if async flip is used. Introduce the minimum and interim
ddb allocation configuration for that purpose. Also i915 is
replaced with intel_display within the patch's context
v2: update min/interim ddb declarations and handling (Ville)
update to register definitions styling
consolidation of minimal wm0 check with min DDB check
Bspec: 69880, 72053
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241121112726.510220-4-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com
We need to be able to do both MMIO and DSB based pipe/plane
programming. To that end plumb the 'dsb' all way from the top
into the plane commit hooks.
The compiler appears smart enough to combine the branches from
all the back-to-back register writes into a single branch.
So the generated asm ends up looking more or less like this:
plane_hook()
{
if (dsb) {
intel_dsb_reg_write();
intel_dsb_reg_write();
...
} else {
intel_de_write_fw();
intel_de_write_fw();
...
}
}
which seems like a reasonably efficient way to do this.
An alternative I was also considering is some kind of closure
(register write function + display vs. dsb pointer passed to it).
That does result is smaller code as there are no branches anymore,
but having each register access go via function pointer sounds
less efficient.
Not that I actually measured the overhead of either approach yet.
Also the reg_rw tracepoint seems to be making a huge mess of the
generated code for the mmio path. And additionally there's some
kind of IS_GSI_REG() hack in __raw_uncore_read() which ends up
generating a pointless branch for every mmio register access.
So looks like there might be quite a bit of room for improvement
in the mmio path still.
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240930170415.23841-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cross-driver (xe-core) Changes:
- Require BMG scanout buffers to be 64k physically aligned (Maarten)
Core (drm) Changes:
- Introducing Xe2 ccs modifiers for integrated and discrete graphics (Juha-Pekka)
Driver Changes:
- General cleanup and more work moving towards intel_display isolation (Jani)
- New display workaround (Suraj)
- Use correct cp_irq_count on HDCP (Suraj)
- eDP PSR fix when CRC is enabled (Jouni)
- Fix DP MST state after a sink reset (Imre)
- Fix Arrow Lake GSC firmware version (John)
- Use chained DSBs for LUT programming (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZtCC0lJ0Zf3MoSdW@intel.com
I don't think the display hardware really has such chroma
plane tile row alignment requirements as outlined in
commit d156135e6a ("drm/i915/tgl: Make sure a semiplanar
UV plane is tile row size aligned")
Bspec had the same exact thing to say about earlier hardware
as well, but we never cared and things work just fine.
The one thing mentioned in that commit that is definitely
true however is the fence alignment issue. But we don't
deal with that on earlier hardware either. We do have code
to deal with that issue for the first color plane, but not
the chroma planes. So I think if we did want to check this
more extensively we should do it in the same places where
we already check the first color plane (namely
convert_plane_offset_to_xy() and intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_init()).
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Different hardware generations have different scanout alignment
requirements. Introduce a new vfunc that will allow us to
make that distinction without horrible if-ladders.
For now we directly plug in the existing intel_surf_alignment()
and intel_cursor_alignment() functions.
For fbdev we (temporarily) introduce intel_fbdev_min_alignment()
that simply queries the alignment from the primary plane of
the first crtc.
TODO: someone will need to fix xe's alignment handling
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Having the plane WM/DDB regitster write functions in skl_watermarks.c
is rather annoying when trying to implement DSB based plane updates.
Move them into the respective files that handle all other plane
register writes. Less places where I need to worry about the DSB
vs. MMIO decisions.
The downside is that we spread the wm struct details a bit further
afield. But if that becomes too annoying we can probably abstract
things a bit more with a few extra functions.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240510152329.24098-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
On bdw-glk the sync->async flip change takes an extra frame due to
the double buffering behaviour of the async flip plane control bit.
Since on skl+ we are now explicitly converting the first async flip
to a sync flip (in order to allow changing the modifier and/or
ddb/watermarks) we are now taking two extra frames until async flips
are actually active. We can drop that back down to one frame by
setting the async flip bit already during the sync flip.
Note that on bdw we don't currently do the extra sync flip (see
intel_plane_do_async_flip()) so technically we wouldn't have
to deal with this in i9xx_plane_update_arm(). But I added the
relevant snippet of code there as well, just in case we ever
decide to go for the extra sync flip on pre-skl platforms as
well (we might, for example, want to change the fb stride).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240430095639.26390-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
On MTL the GOP (for whatever reason) likes to bind its framebuffer
high up in the ggtt address space. This can conflict with whatever
ggtt_reserve_guc_top() is trying to do, and the result is that
ggtt_reserve_guc_top() fails and then we proceed to explode when
trying to tear down the driver. Thus far I haven't analyzed what
causes the actual fireworks, but it's not super important as even
if it didn't explode we'd still fail the driver load and the user
would be left with an unusable GPU.
To remedy this (without having to figure out exactly what
ggtt_reserve_guc_top() is trying to achieve) we can attempt to
relocate the BIOS framebuffer to a lower ggtt address. We can do
this at this early point in driver init because nothing else is
supposed to be clobbering the ggtt yet. So we simply change where
in the ggtt we pin the vma, the original PTEs will be left as is,
and the new PTEs will get written with the same dma addresses.
The plane will keep on scanning out from the original PTEs until
we are done with the whole process, and at that point we rewrite
the plane's surface address register to point at the new ggtt
address.
Since we don't need a specific ggtt address for the plane
(apart from needing it to land in the mappable region for
normal stolen objects) we'll just try to pin it without a fixed
offset first. It should end up at the lowest available address
(which really should be 0 at this point in the driver init).
If that fails we'll fall back to just pinning it exactly to the
origianal address.
To make sure we don't accidentlally pin it partially over the
original ggtt range (as that would corrupt the original PTEs)
we reserve the original range temporarily during this process.
v2: Try to pin explicitly to ggtt offset 0 as otherwise DG2 puts it
even higher (atm we have no PIN_LOW flag to force it low)
v3: "fix" xe
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202224340.30647-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Currently we are enabling selective fetch for all planes that are visible.
This is suboptimal as we might be fetching for memory for planes that are
not part of selective update.
Fix this by adding proper handling for disabling plane selective fetch:
If plane previously part of selective update is now not part of update:
Add it into updated planes and let the plane configuration to disable
selective fetch for it.
v3: Checkpatch warnings fixed
v2:
- Add setting sel_fetch_area->y1/y2 to -1
- Remove setting again local sel_fetch_area variable
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231120082606.3156488-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
