Move the arm64 CRC-T10DIF assembly code into the lib directory and wire
it up to the library interface. This allows it to be used without going
through the crypto API. It remains usable via the crypto API too via
the shash algorithms that use the library interface. Thus all the
arch-specific "shash" code becomes unnecessary and is removed.
Note: to see the diff from arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c to
arch/arm64/lib/crc-t10dif-glue.c, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241202012056.209768-7-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
The other stress test programs provide a SIGUSR1 handler which modifies the
live register state in order to validate that signal context is being
restored during signal return. While we can't usefully do this when testing
kernel mode FP usage provide a handler for SIGUSR1 which just counts the
number of signals like we do for SIGUSR2, allowing fp-stress to treat all
the test programs uniformly.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107-arm64-fp-stress-irritator-v2-5-c4b9622e36ee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently fp-stress only covers userspace use of floating point, it does
not cover any kernel mode uses. Since currently kernel mode floating
point usage can't be preempted and there are explicit preemption points in
the existing implementations this isn't so important for fp-stress but
when we readd preemption it will be good to try to exercise it.
When the arm64 accelerated crypto operations are implemented we can
relatively straightforwardly trigger kernel mode floating point usage by
using the crypto userspace API to hash data, using the splice() support
in an effort to minimise copying. We use /proc/crypto to check which
accelerated implementations are available, picking the first symmetric
hash we find. We run the kernel mode test unconditionally, replacing the
second copy of the FPSIMD testcase for systems with FPSIMD only. If we
don't think there are any suitable kernel mode implementations we fall back
to running another copy of fpsimd-stress.
There are a number issues with this approach, we don't actually verify
that we are using an accelerated (or even CPU) implementation of the
algorithm being tested and even with attempting to use splice() to
minimise copying there are sizing limits on how much data gets spliced
at once.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521-arm64-fp-stress-kernel-v1-1-e38f107baad4@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
