When printing the signal context's PC, we use a "%lx" format specifier,
which matches the common userland (glibc's) definition of uint64_t as an
"unsigned long". However the structure in question is defined in a
kernel uapi header, which uses a self defined __u64 type, and the arm64
kernel headers define this using "int-ll64.h", so it becomes an
"unsigned long long". This mismatch leads to the usual compiler warning.
The common fix would be to use "PRIx64", but because this is defined by
the userland's toolchain libc headers, it wouldn't match as well. Since
we know the exact type of __u64, just use "%llx" here instead, to silence
this warning.
This also fixes a more severe typo: "$lx" is not a valid format
specifier.
Fixes: 191e678bdc ("kselftest/arm64: Log unexpected asynchronous MTE faults")
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816153251.2833702-7-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
If MTE is not available on a system, we detect this early and skip all
the MTE selftests. However this happens before we print the TAP plan, so
tools parsing the TAP output get confused and report an error.
Use the existing ksft_exit_skip() function to handle this, which uses a
dummy plan to work with tools expecting proper TAP syntax, as described
in the TAP specification.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816153251.2833702-4-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
mte_switch_mode() currently rejects attempts to set a zero tag however
there are tests such as check_tags_inclusion which attempt to cover cases
with zero tags using mte_switch_mode(). Since it is not clear why we are
rejecting zero tags change the test to accept them.
The issue has not previously been as apparent as it should be since the
return value of mte_switch_mode() was not always checked in the callers
and the tests weren't otherwise failing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510164520.768783-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The MTE selftests create temporary files in /dev/shm, for later mmap-ing
them. When there is no tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm, or /dev/shm does not
exist in the first place (on minimal filesystems), the error message is
not giving good hints:
# FAIL: Unable to open temporary file
# FAIL: memory allocation
not ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, ...
Add a perror() call, that gives both the filename and the actual error
reason, so that users get a chance of correcting that.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-12-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against a very particular feature version (0b0010), even though
the ARM ARM promises ID register features to be backwards compatible.
While this could be fixed by using ">=" instead of "==", we should
actually use the explicit HWCAP2_MTE hardware capability, exposed by the
kernel via the ELF auxiliary vectors.
That moves this responsibility to the kernel, and fixes running the
tests on machines with FEAT_MTE3 capability.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This test checks that the memory tag is present after mte allocation and
the memory is accessible with those tags. This testcase verifies all
sync, async and none mte error reporting mode. The allocated mte buffers
are verified for Allocated range (no error expected while accessing
buffer), Underflow range, and Overflow range.
Different test scenarios covered here are,
* Verify that mte memory are accessible at byte/block level.
* Force underflow and overflow to occur and check the data consistency.
* Check to/from between tagged and untagged memory.
* Check that initial allocated memory to have 0 tag.
This change also creates the necessary infrastructure to add mte test
cases. MTE kselftests can use the several utility functions provided here
to add wide variety of mte test scenarios.
GCC compiler need flag '-march=armv8.5-a+memtag' so those flags are
verified before compilation.
The mte testcases can be launched with kselftest framework as,
make TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte kselftest
or compiled as,
make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte CC='compiler'
Co-developed-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-2-amit.kachhap@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
