In cases where we don't reference another schema, 'additionalProperties'
can be used instead. This is preferred for now as 'unevaluatedProperties'
support isn't implemented yet.
In a few cases, this means adding some missing property definitions of
which most are for SPI bus properties. 'unevaluatedProperties' is not going
to work for the SPI bus properties anyways as they are evaluated from the
parent node, not the SPI child node.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005183830.486085-3-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can
check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present
in schemas.
'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via
'$ref') and all possible properties and/or child nodes are not
explicitly listed in the schema with the '$ref'.
This is in preparation to add a meta-schema to check for missing
'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties'. This has been a
constant source of review issues.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005183830.486085-2-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The example contains an SPI bus and device, but doesn't have the
appropriate size and address cells size.
This creates a DTC warning when the example is compiled since the default
ones will not match what the device uses. Let's add them to remove that
warning.
Fixes: f7356e4703 ("dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7192: Add binding documentation for AD7192")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The AD7192 binding describes two regulator properties, avdd-supply and
dvdd-supply, but describes it as a constant string that must be avdd and
dvdd. This is wrong since a *-supply property is actually a phandle, and
results in warnings when the example is validated (or any device tree using
that device, for that matter).
Let's remove that requirement.
Fixes: f7356e4703 ("dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7192: Add binding documentation for AD7192")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
