Giant svm range split to smaller ranges, align the range start address
to max svm range pages to improve MMU TLB usage.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This will be used to split giant svm range into smaller ranges, to
support VRAM overcommitment by giant range and improve GPU retry fault
recover on giant range.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
To support SVM range VRAM overcommitment, TTM should be able to evict
svm bo of same process to system memory, to get space to alloc new svm
bo.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The comments say that the product number is a 16-digit HEX string so the
buffer needs to be at least 17 characters to hold the NUL terminator. Expand
the buffer size to 20 to avoid the alignment issues.
The comment:Product number should only be 16 characters. Any
more,and something could be wrong. Cap it at 16 to be safe
Signed-off-by: Roy Sun <Roy.Sun@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701190227.284783-2-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701190227.284783-1-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-8-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-7-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-6-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-5-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-4-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested/allocated, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-3-dakr@redhat.com
idr_init_base(), implemented by commit 6ce711f275 ("idr: Make 1-based
IDRs more efficient"), let us set an arbitrary base other than
idr_init(), which uses base 0.
Since, for this IDR, no ID < 1 is ever requested, using
idr_init_base(&idr, 1) avoids unnecessary tree walks.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701185303.284082-2-dakr@redhat.com
Disable the DMC event handlers before loading the firmware and after
uninitializing the display, to make sure the firmware is inactive. This
matches the Bspec "Sequences for Display C5 and C6" page for GEN12+.
Add a TODO comment for doing the same on pre-GEN12 platforms.
v2:
- Add a macro for the number of event handlers.
- Disable the event handlers only on GEN12+.
- s/dev_priv/i915/ in docbook comment.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> #v1
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220728081440.1676857-1-imre.deak@intel.com
TLB cache invalidation can happen on two different situations:
1. synchronously, at __vma_put_pages();
2. asynchronously.
On the first case, TLB cache invalidation happens inside
__vma_put_pages(). So, no need to do it later on.
However, on the second case, the pages will keep in memory
until __i915_vma_evict() is called.
So, we need to store the TLB data at struct i915_vma_resource,
in order to do a TLB cache invalidation before allowing
userspace to re-use the same memory.
So, i915_vma_resource_unbind() has gained a new parameter
in order to store the TLB data at the second case.
Document it.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/aa55eef7e63b8f3d0f69b525db2dd2eb87e9db6b.1658924372.git.mchehab@kernel.org
Invalidate TLB in batches, in order to reduce performance regressions.
Currently, every caller performs a full barrier around a TLB
invalidation, ignoring all other invalidations that may have already
removed their PTEs from the cache. As this is a synchronous operation
and can be quite slow, we cause multiple threads to contend on the TLB
invalidate mutex blocking userspace.
We only need to invalidate the TLB once after replacing our PTE to
ensure that there is no possible continued access to the physical
address before releasing our pages. By tracking a seqno for each full
TLB invalidate we can quickly determine if one has been performed since
rewriting the PTE, and only if necessary trigger one for ourselves.
That helps to reduce the performance regression introduced by TLB
invalidate logic.
[mchehab: rebased to not require moving the code to a separate file]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7938d61591 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")
Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Cc: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e97ef5deb6739cadaaf40aa45620547e9c4ec06.1658924372.git.mchehab@kernel.org
PCI bar resize only works with 64 bit BAR so disable
this on 32-bit machine and resolve below compilation error:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c:94:23: error: result of
comparison of constant 4294967296 with expression of type
'resource_size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
root_res->start > 0x100000000ull)
Fixes: a91d1a17cd ("drm/i915: Add support for LMEM PCIe resizable bar")
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220727173306.16247-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com
