Currently in validate_reserved() we check the basic form and contents of
an EXTRA_CONTEXT block but do not actually validate anything inside the
data block it provides. Extend the validation to do so, when we get to the
terminator for the main data block reset and start walking the extra data
block instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-8-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently for the more complex signal context types we validate the context
specific details the end of the parsing loop validate_reserved() if we've
ever seen a context of that type. This is currently merely a bit inefficient
but will get a bit awkward when we start parsing extra_context, at which
point we will need to reset the head to advance into the extra space that
extra_context provides. Instead only do the more detailed checks on each
context type the first time we see that context type.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently in validate_extra_context() we assert both that the extra data
pointed to by the EXTRA_CONTEXT is 16 byte aligned and that it immediately
follows the struct _aarch64_ctx providing the terminator for the linked
list of contexts in the signal frame. Since struct _aarch64_ctx is an 8
byte structure which must be 16 byte aligned these cannot both be true. As
documented in sigcontext.h and implemented by the kernel the extra data
should be at the next 16 byte aligned address after the terminator so fix
the validation to match.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
When arm64 signal context data overflows the base struct sigcontext it gets
placed in an extra buffer pointed to by a record of type EXTRA_CONTEXT in
the base struct sigcontext which is required to be the last record in the
base struct sigframe. The current validation code attempts to check this
by using GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD() to step forward from the current record to
the next but that is a macro which assumes it is being provided with a
struct _aarch64_ctx and uses the size there to skip forward to the next
record. Instead validate_extra_context() passes it a struct extra_context
which has a separate size field. This compiles but results in us trying
to validate a termination record in completely the wrong place, at best
failing validation and at worst just segfaulting. Fix this by passing
the struct _aarch64_ctx we meant to into the macro.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
A signal frame with SVE may validly either be a bare struct sve_context or
a struct sve_context followed by vector length dependent register data.
Support either in the generic helpers for the signal tests, and while we're
at it validate the SVE vector length reported.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
There is a spelling mistake in an error message literal string. Fix it.
Fixes: f96bf43403 ("kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle and common utils")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Add a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which builds a ucontext_t with a bad
magic header and place it onto the stack. Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS.
Introduce a common utility assembly trampoline function to invoke a
sigreturn while placing the provided sigframe at wanted alignment and
also an helper to make space when needed inside the sigframe reserved
area.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Add some arm64/signal specific boilerplate and utility code to help
further testcases' development.
Introduce also one simple testcase mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle
and some related helpers: it is a simple mangle testcase which messes
with the ucontext_t from within the signal handler, trying to toggle
PSTATE state bits to switch the system between 32bit/64bit execution
state. Expects SIGSEGV on test PASS.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
