intel_de_wait*() take the timeout in milliseconds. Include
that information in the function name to make life less
confusing. I'll also be introducing microsecond variants
of these later.
Done with cocci:
@@
@@
(
static int
- intel_de_wait
+ intel_de_wait_ms
(...)
{
...
}
|
static int
- intel_de_wait_fw
+ intel_de_wait_fw_ms
(...)
{
...
}
|
static int
- intel_de_wait_for_set
+ intel_de_wait_for_set_ms
(...)
{
...
}
|
static int
- intel_de_wait_for_clear
+ intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms
(...)
{
...
}
)
@@
@@
(
- intel_de_wait
+ intel_de_wait_ms
|
- intel_de_wait_fw
+ intel_de_wait_fw_ms
|
- intel_de_wait_for_set
+ intel_de_wait_for_set_ms
|
- intel_de_wait_for_clear
+ intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms
)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251110172756.2132-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This is a scripted split of the display related register macros from
i915_reg.h to display/intel_display_regs.h. As a starting point, move
all the macros that are only used in display code (or GVT). If there are
users in core i915 code or soc/, or no users anywhere, keep the macros
in i915_reg.h. This is done in groups of macros separated by blank
lines, moving the comments along with the groups.
Some manually picked macro groups are kept/moved regardless of the
heuristics above.
This is obviously a very crude approach. It's not perfect. But there are
4.2k lines in i915_reg.h, and its refactoring has ground to a halt. This
is the big hammer that splits the file to two, and enables further
cleanup.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> # v2
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250606102256.2080073-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rename intel_shared_dpll to intel_dpll to represent both
shared and individual dplls. Since from MTL each PHY has it's
own PLL making the shared PLL naming a little outdated. In an
effort to make this framework accepting of future changes this
needs to be done.
--v2
-Use intel_dpll_global to make sure names start with the filename
[Jani/Ville]
-Explain the need of this rename [Jani]
--v3
-Just keep it intel_dpll [Jani]
--v4
-Fix comment [Jani]
-Use just num_dpll and dplls [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Now that INTEL_PCH_TYPE() and HAS_PCH_*() macros are under display, and
accept a struct intel_display pointer, use that instead of struct
drm_i915_private pointer in display code.
This is done naively by running:
$ sed -i 's/\(INTEL_PCH_TYPE\|HAS_PCH_[A-Z0-9_-]*\)([^)]*)/\1(display)/g' \
$(find drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display -name "*.c")
and fixing the fallout, i.e. removing unused local i915 variables and
adding display variables where needed.
v2: Rebase
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/999f4d7b8ed11739b1c5ec8d6408fc39d5e3776b.1744880985.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
On ILK-IVB only PCH outputs use shared dplls. Move the relevant
intel_disable_shared_dpll() into ilk_pch_post_disable() to make
that clear (and if we extend the dpll mgr to cover all plls we need
different enable/disable points anyway for the PCH vs. CPU eDP cases).
The intel_enable_shared_dpll() counterpart was already in
ilk_pch_enable() anyway, so this is the more symmetric place for the
disable as well.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250310183528.3203-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
struct intel_dpll_hw_state has a spot for all possible
PLL registers across all platforms (well, apart from
cx0/snps). This makes it rather confusing when trying to
figure out which members belong to which platform(s).
Split the struct up into five different platform specific
sub-structures. For now this will actually increase the size
a little bit as we have to duplicate a few members from
skl to icl, but that will be remedied soon when we turn
the thing into a union.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rename PIPECONF to TRANSCONF to make it clear what it actually
applies to.
While the usual convention is to pick the earliers name I think
in this case it's more clear to use the later name. Especially
as even the register offset is in the wrong range (0x70000 vs.
0x60000) and thus makes it look like this is per-pipe.
There is one place in gvt that's doing something with TRANSCONF
while iterating with for_each_pipe(). So that might not be doing
the right thing for TRANSCODER_EDP, dunno. Not knowing what it
does I left it as is to avoid breakage.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Name the CPU transcoder timing registers TRANS_FOO rather than
just FOO. This is the modern name, after the pipe/transcoder split
happened. Makes it a bit more obvious whether you pass in a pipe or
a transcoder.
PIPESRC is a bit special as it's a pipe register, even though it
lives in the transcoder registers range (0x60000 instead of 0x70000).
And BCLRPAT I suppose is a transcoder register (since it has something
to do with the timing generator), but it doesn't even exist after gen4
so I left it to use the only name it ever had in bspec.
And while at it let's pass in the correct enum in few more
places why don't we. Although in all those places the distinction
doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
