clangd reports many "unused header" warnings throughout the Xe driver.
Start working to clean this up by removing unnecessary includes in our
.c files and/or replacing them with explicit includes of other headers
that were previously being included indirectly.
By far the most common offender here was unnecessary inclusion of
xe_gt.h. That likely originates from the early days of xe.ko when
xe_mmio did not exist and all register accesses, including those
unrelated to GTs, were done with GT functions.
There's still a lot of additional #include cleanup that can be done in
the headers themselves; that will come as a followup series.
v2:
- Squash the 79-patch series down to a single patch. (MattB)
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260115032803.4067824-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
A common pattern is to create a locked bo, pin it without mapping
and then unlock it. Add a function to do that, which internally
uses xe_validation_guard().
With that we can remove xe_bo_create_locked_range() and add
exhaustive eviction to stolen, pf_provision_vf_lmem and
psmi_alloc_object.
v4:
- New patch after reorganization.
v5:
- Replace DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WB with 0. (CI)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250908101246.65025-13-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
We want all validation (potential backing store allocation) to be part
of a drm_exec transaction. Therefore add a drm_exec pointer argument
to xe_bo_validate() and ___xe_bo_create_locked(). Upcoming patches
will deal with making all (or nearly all) calls to these functions
part of a drm_exec transaction. In the meantime, define special values
of the drm_exec pointer:
XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED: Implementation of the drm_exec transaction
has not been done yet.
XE_VALIDATION_UNSUPPORTED: Some Middle-layers (dma-buf) doesn't allow
the drm_exec context to be passed down to map_attachment where
validation takes place.
XE_VALIDATION_OPT_OUT: May be used only for kunit tests where exhaustive
eviction isn't crucial and the ROI of converting those is very
small.
For XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED and XE_VALIDATION_OPT_OUT there is also
a lockdep check that a drm_exec transaction can indeed start at the
location where the macro is expanded. This is to encourage
developers to take this into consideration early in the code
development process.
v2:
- Fix xe_vm_set_validation_exec() imbalance. Add an assert that
hopefully catches future instances of this (Matt Brost)
v3:
- Extend to psmi_alloc_object
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> #v3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250908101246.65025-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Requirement for PSMI capture is to have a physically contiguous buffer.
All the needed configuration is done by the userspace tool directly to
the GPU via mmio access.
This interface only support allocating from VRAM regions. For integrated
devices, the PSMI buffer is in SYSTEM memory and should be allocated by
userspace using hugetlbfs.
Here we add the ability to allocate a region of physically contiguous
memory by writing to debugfs file (listed below). For multi-tile devices,
the capture tool requires ability to allocate a capture buffer per tile
(VRAM region) and so user can specify a region_mask. The tool then
can mmap the buffers via direct mmap of the PCIBAR via sysfs.
To support the capture tool, 3 new debugfs entries are added:
psmi_capture_addr - physical address per VRAM region's capture buffer
psmi_capture_region_mask - select which region(s) to allocate a buffer
psmi_capture_size - size of current capture buffer
Writing psmi_capture_size will allocate new buffer of requested size per
region after freeing any current buffers.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Original-author: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> # v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250821-psmi-v5-2-34ab7550d3d8@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
