This was done entirely with mindless brute force, using
git grep -l '\<k[vmz]*alloc_objs*(.*, GFP_KERNEL)' |
xargs sed -i 's/\(alloc_objs*(.*\), GFP_KERNEL)/\1)/'
to convert the new alloc_obj() users that had a simple GFP_KERNEL
argument to just drop that argument.
Note that due to the extreme simplicity of the scripting, any slightly
more complex cases spread over multiple lines would not be triggered:
they definitely exist, but this covers the vast bulk of the cases, and
the resulting diff is also then easier to check automatically.
For the same reason the 'flex' versions will be done as a separate
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci. The script is designed to
avoid scalar types (which need careful case-by-case checking), and
instead replace kmalloc-family calls that allocate struct or union
object instances:
Single allocations: kmalloc(sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_obj(TYPE, ...)
Array allocations: kmalloc_array(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_objs(TYPE, COUNT, ...)
Flex array allocations: kmalloc(struct_size(PTR, FAM, COUNT), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_flex(*PTR, FAM, COUNT, ...)
(where TYPE may also be *VAR)
The resulting allocations no longer return "void *", instead returning
"TYPE *".
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Having all the new guards, use them in the vt code. This improves
readability, makes error handling easier, and marks locked portions of
code explicit.
A local free_page_ptr __free guard is introduced for
__get_free_page/free_page (with proper casts). This could be made public
in include/. But I am not sure if there are more possible users, so
keeping completely private here.
Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250814072456.182853-16-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit b35f7a773c.
A new version of the series was submitted, so it's easier to revert the
old one and add the new one due to the changes invovled.
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tty/vt currently uses memdup_user() and vmemdup_array_user() to copy
userspace arrays.
Whereas there is no danger of overflowing, the call to vmemdup_user()
currently utilizes array_size() to calculate the array size
nevertheless. This is not useful because array_size() would return
SIZE_MAX and pass it to vmemdup_user() in case of (the impossible)
overflow.
string.h from the core-API now provides the wrappers memdup_array_user()
and vmemdup_array_user() to copy userspace arrays in a standardized
manner. Additionally, they also perform generic overflow-checks.
Use these wrappers to make it more obvious and readable that arrays are
being copied.
As we are at it, remove two unnecessary empty lines.
Suggested-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103111207.74621-2-pstanner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090537.15557-4-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
con_do_clear_unimap() currently decreases and increases refcount of old
dictionary in a back and forth fashion. This makes the code really hard
to follow. Decrease the refcount only if everything went well and we
really allocated a new one and decoupled from the old dictionary.
I sincerelly hope I did not make a mistake in this (ill) logic.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-33-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-30-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-29-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-28-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-27-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-26-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-25-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-24-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-23-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-22-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-21-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-20-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The code currently does shift, OR, and AND logic directly in the code.
It is not much obvious what happens there. Therefore define four macros
for that purpose and use them in the code. We use GENMASK() so that it
is clear which bits serve what purpose:
- UNI_GLYPH: bits 0.. 5
- UNI_ROW: bits 6..10
- UNI_DIR: bits 11..31
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-10-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
