mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-04-19 23:34:00 -04:00
8f79870ec8
Settle on three "flavors" of uprobe/uretprobe, installed on different kinds of instruction: nop, push, and ret. All three are testing different internal code paths emulating or single-stepping instructions, so are interesting to compare and benchmark separately. To ensure `push rbp` instruction we ensure that uprobe_target_push() is not a leaf function by calling (global __weak) noop function and returning something afterwards (if we don't do that, compiler will just do a tail call optimization). Also, we need to make sure that compiler isn't skipping frame pointer generation, so let's add `-fno-omit-frame-pointers` to Makefile. Just to give an idea of where we currently stand in terms of relative performance of different uprobe/uretprobe cases vs a cheap syscall (getpgid()) baseline, here are results from my local machine: $ benchs/run_bench_uprobes.sh base : 1.561 ± 0.020M/s uprobe-nop : 0.947 ± 0.007M/s uprobe-push : 0.951 ± 0.004M/s uprobe-ret : 0.443 ± 0.007M/s uretprobe-nop : 0.471 ± 0.013M/s uretprobe-push : 0.483 ± 0.004M/s uretprobe-ret : 0.306 ± 0.007M/s Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240301214551.1686095-1-andrii@kernel.org
10 lines
213 B
Bash
Executable File
10 lines
213 B
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/bash
|
|
|
|
set -eufo pipefail
|
|
|
|
for i in base {uprobe,uretprobe}-{nop,push,ret}
|
|
do
|
|
summary=$(sudo ./bench -w2 -d5 -a trig-$i | tail -n1 | cut -d'(' -f1 | cut -d' ' -f3-)
|
|
printf "%-15s: %s\n" $i "$summary"
|
|
done
|