mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-04-30 20:42:33 -04:00
e6fbd1759c
This follow-up patch completes centralization of kselftest.h and ksefltest_harness.h includes in remaining seltests files, replacing all relative paths with a non-relative paths using shared -I include path in lib.mk Tested with gcc-13.3 and clang-18.1, and cross-compiled successfully on riscv, arm64, x86_64 and powerpc arch. [reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com: add selftests include path for kselftest.h] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251017090201.317521-1-reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251016104409.68985-1-reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250820143954.33d95635e504e94df01930d0@linux-foundation.org/ Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Jakub Kacinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mickael Salaun <mic@digikod.net> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
67 lines
1.8 KiB
C
67 lines
1.8 KiB
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
|
|
#include "hwprobe.h"
|
|
#include "kselftest.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char **argv)
|
|
{
|
|
struct riscv_hwprobe pairs[8];
|
|
unsigned long cpus;
|
|
long out;
|
|
|
|
ksft_print_header();
|
|
ksft_set_plan(5);
|
|
|
|
/* Fake the CPU_SET ops. */
|
|
cpus = -1;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Just run a basic test: pass enough pairs to get up to the base
|
|
* behavior, and then check to make sure it's sane.
|
|
*/
|
|
for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++)
|
|
pairs[i].key = i;
|
|
|
|
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, &cpus, 0);
|
|
if (out != 0)
|
|
ksft_exit_fail_msg("hwprobe() failed with %ld\n", out);
|
|
|
|
for (long i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
|
|
/* Fail if the kernel claims not to recognize a base key. */
|
|
if ((i < 4) && (pairs[i].key != i))
|
|
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to recognize base key: key != i, "
|
|
"key=%lld, i=%ld\n", pairs[i].key, i);
|
|
|
|
if (pairs[i].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (pairs[i].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected pair: (%lld, %llu)\n", pairs[i].key, pairs[i].value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, 0, 0);
|
|
ksft_test_result(out == 0, "NULL CPU set\n");
|
|
|
|
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, &cpus, 0);
|
|
ksft_test_result(out != 0, "Bad CPU set\n");
|
|
|
|
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0);
|
|
ksft_test_result(out != 0, "NULL CPU set with non-zero size\n");
|
|
|
|
pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR;
|
|
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0);
|
|
ksft_test_result(out == 0 && pairs[0].key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR,
|
|
"Existing key is maintained\n");
|
|
|
|
pairs[0].key = 0x5555;
|
|
pairs[1].key = 1;
|
|
pairs[1].value = 0xAAAA;
|
|
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 2, 0, 0, 0);
|
|
ksft_test_result(out == 0 && pairs[0].key == -1 &&
|
|
pairs[1].key == 1 && pairs[1].value != 0xAAAA,
|
|
"Unknown key overwritten with -1 and doesn't block other elements\n");
|
|
|
|
ksft_finished();
|
|
}
|