landlock: Fix TCP handling of short AF_UNSPEC addresses

current_check_access_socket() treats AF_UNSPEC addresses as
AF_INET ones, and only later adds special case handling to
allow connect(AF_UNSPEC), and on IPv4 sockets
bind(AF_UNSPEC+INADDR_ANY).
This would be fine except AF_UNSPEC addresses can be as
short as a bare AF_UNSPEC sa_family_t field, and nothing
more. The AF_INET code path incorrectly enforces a length of
sizeof(struct sockaddr_in) instead.

Move AF_UNSPEC edge case handling up inside the switch-case,
before the address is (potentially incorrectly) treated as
AF_INET.

Fixes: fff69fb03d ("landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect")
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251027190726.626244-4-matthieu@buffet.re
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
This commit is contained in:
Matthieu Buffet
2025-10-27 20:07:26 +01:00
committed by Mickaël Salaün
parent 552dbf47a8
commit e4d82cbce2

View File

@@ -71,6 +71,61 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
switch (address->sa_family) {
case AF_UNSPEC:
if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
/*
* Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves
* the TCP association, which have the same effect as
* closing the connection while retaining the socket
* object (i.e., the file descriptor). As for dropping
* privileges, closing connections is always allowed.
*
* For a TCP access control system, this request is
* legitimate. Let the network stack handle potential
* inconsistencies and return -EINVAL if needed.
*/
return 0;
} else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
/*
* Binding to an AF_UNSPEC address is treated
* differently by IPv4 and IPv6 sockets. The socket's
* family may change under our feet due to
* setsockopt(IPV6_ADDRFORM), but that's ok: we either
* reject entirely or require
* %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP for the given port, so
* it cannot be used to bypass the policy.
*
* IPv4 sockets map AF_UNSPEC to AF_INET for
* retrocompatibility for bind accesses, only if the
* address is INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). IPv6
* sockets always reject it.
*
* Checking the address is required to not wrongfully
* return -EACCES instead of -EAFNOSUPPORT or -EINVAL.
* We could return 0 and let the network stack handle
* these checks, but it is safer to return a proper
* error and test consistency thanks to kselftest.
*/
if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family == AF_INET) {
const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
(struct sockaddr_in *)address;
if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
return -EINVAL;
if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr !=
htonl(INADDR_ANY))
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
} else {
if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133)
return -EINVAL;
else
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
}
} else {
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
/* Only for bind(AF_UNSPEC+INADDR_ANY) on IPv4 socket. */
fallthrough;
case AF_INET: {
const struct sockaddr_in *addr4;
@@ -119,57 +174,18 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
return 0;
}
/* Specific AF_UNSPEC handling. */
if (address->sa_family == AF_UNSPEC) {
/*
* Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves the TCP
* association, which have the same effect as closing the
* connection while retaining the socket object (i.e., the file
* descriptor). As for dropping privileges, closing
* connections is always allowed.
*
* For a TCP access control system, this request is legitimate.
* Let the network stack handle potential inconsistencies and
* return -EINVAL if needed.
*/
if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)
return 0;
/*
* For compatibility reason, accept AF_UNSPEC for bind
* accesses (mapped to AF_INET) only if the address is
* INADDR_ANY (cf. __inet_bind). Checking the address is
* required to not wrongfully return -EACCES instead of
* -EAFNOSUPPORT.
*
* We could return 0 and let the network stack handle these
* checks, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
* consistency thanks to kselftest.
*/
if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP) {
/* addrlen has already been checked for AF_UNSPEC. */
const struct sockaddr_in *const sockaddr =
(struct sockaddr_in *)address;
if (sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family != AF_INET)
return -EINVAL;
if (sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY))
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
}
} else {
/*
* Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
* -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
* only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
*
* We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
* check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
* consistency thanks to kselftest.
*/
if (address->sa_family != sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family)
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* Checks sa_family consistency to not wrongfully return
* -EACCES instead of -EINVAL. Valid sa_family changes are
* only (from AF_INET or AF_INET6) to AF_UNSPEC.
*
* We could return 0 and let the network stack handle this
* check, but it is safer to return a proper error and test
* consistency thanks to kselftest.
*/
if (address->sa_family != sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family &&
address->sa_family != AF_UNSPEC)
return -EINVAL;
id.key.data = (__force uintptr_t)port;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(port) > sizeof(id.key.data));